Tangerang, Monday, July 7, 2025 – In a recent Journalism class presentation at Muhammadiyah University of Tangerang, Group 12, consisting of Retno Cahya Wulandari and Bella Putri Lesmana, delivered an engaging presentation titled “Reader Feedback as a Journalistic Product Evaluation Tool.” Their presentation emphasized how reader feedback serves not only as a means of evaluating news quality but also plays a key role in promoting transparency, accountability, and public trust in the media.
Retno Cahya Wulandari, who presented slides 3 through 7, opened the session by explaining that in journalism, feedback refers to readers’ responses to published news content. This feedback acts as an indicator of how well the message has been understood. She described various forms of feedback positive, negative, verbal, nonverbal, direct, and indirect, and stressed the importance of recognizing these types so that media outlets can respond appropriately and professionally. Retno also noted that readers today can provide feedback through numerous channels such as social media comments, discussion forums, surveys, and letters to the editor. All of these forms help media outlets better understand audience reactions and serve as a bridge for strengthening the relationship between journalists and the public.
Bella Putri Lesmana continued the presentation with slides 8 to 11, discussing the strategic benefits of reader feedback in maintaining the quality and credibility of news media. She explained that feedback can help media correct errors, improve content relevance, and build stronger connections with the public. Bella presented a real-world case study involving the international news outlet The Guardian, which published an article on June 26, 2025, concerning international law. After receiving reader feedback pointing out a legal inaccuracy, the media outlet corrected the article on June 27, 2025. According to Bella, this not only reflected the media’s accountability but also showed that readers play a vital role as guardians of information accuracy. In a global context, such feedback helps uphold objectivity, encourages multi-layered verification, and strengthens a media outlet’s credibility on the world stage. Bella also acknowledged the challenges of managing reader feedback, including overwhelming volume, varied quality of input, and anonymous or disruptive users. She concluded her segment with practical strategies such as establishing response standards, ensuring transparency in revisions, and using feedback as training material for newsroom staff.
During the Q&A session, two important questions were raised by participants from other groups. The first question came from Tarum Ningsih of Group 7, who asked, “If you were a journalist and received negative feedback on social media due to a misunderstanding of your article, how would you respond to maintain media credibility and public trust?” The answer emphasized staying calm and not responding emotionally. The journalist should first identify where the misunderstanding occurred and then issue a friendly and open clarification, either through a direct reply or an additional post. For example: “Thank you for reading and sharing your thoughts. It seems there was a part of the article that may have been unclear. What I meant was... (followed by a clearer explanation).” This approach not only helps clear up the misunderstanding but also demonstrates accountability and builds trust among other readers who observe the interaction.
The second question came from Firda Nurussalamah of Group 10, who asked in English, “In the context of The Guardian corrections case study, what is the strategic significance of reader feedback to international journalistic practice?” The response highlighted that feedback pointing out legal terminology errors shows how readers act as key contributors to maintaining information accuracy. The Guardian case illustrates that corrections are not merely technical issues but may carry political and legal implications, especially when dealing with sensitive topics like Palestine. Therefore, such feedback plays a strategic role in preserving news objectivity, encouraging thorough verification, and enhancing media credibility on a global level.
This presentation deepened students’ understanding of the importance of two-way communication in modern journalism. Through detailed explanations and real-world examples, Group 12 successfully conveyed the message that readers are not just consumers of news but essential partners in upholding journalistic quality, accuracy, and ethics.
Komentar
Posting Komentar